Nondestructive Evaluation Of Fiber Reinforced Polyester Polymer Concrete

H. Jia and C. Vipulanandan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of Houston, Houston TX 77204-4791
Phone: 713-743-4291 E-mail: hjia@bayou.uh.edu


Abstract

	Polyester polymer concrete reinforced with different types of fibers were characterized using the 
impact resonance and the pulse velocity methods.  The effect of fiber type and content on the dynamic 
moduli, damping ratio, and pulse velocity were studied.  Using the ultrasonic method, the pulse velocity in 
polymer concrete and fiber reinforced polymer concrete was measured at frequency of 150 kHz and the 
dynamic moduli of elasticity (Ep) was also determined from the pulse velocity and compared to the static 
moduli. The response of cylinders and prisms in the three fundamental modes of vibration, namely, 
longitudinal, transverse, and torsional, were investigated.  From the longitudinal and transverse  and 
torsional resonance frequencies the dynamic Young’s modulus of elasticity, the dynamic moduli of rigidity 
and dynamic damping ratio and Poisson’s ratio were determined.  Fiber types investigated are PVC, 
polypropylene, glass and steel.  Also the dynamic data obtained from the impact resonance and pulse 
velocity agreed.

1. Introduction

	A fast, reliable and cost effective NDE method would be advantageous in the performance of 
polymer concrete in the laboratory as well as in the field. In this study, both impact resonance and ultrasonic 
pulse velocity method were used to investigate the effect of different fibers on the dynamic properties of 
polyester polymer. The measurements made nondestructively were compared with results obtained from 
destructive tests.

2. Materials and Experimental Procedure
	
	The basic constituents of the polymer concrete (PC) were polyester resin (14%) and blasting sand 
(86%).  PC was reinforced with steel fibers (6%) or non-metal fibers (1%, 3% or 6%).  The fibers was 
added by the weight percentage of PC.  The specimens were allowed to cure for one day at room 
temperature and then at 55-60   for another day.  Two size of cylinders and one size of prism were used: 
small cylinder (1.5 " in diameter and 3 " in length)  and large cylinder (2.5 " in diameter and 6.5 " in length) 
and prism (2.0"2.0"9.0").  Compression testing was performed using a 400 kip capacity Tinius Olsen 
universal testing machine in strain control mode.    Pulse velocity and impact resonance tests were 
performed according to ASTM C 597-83 and C 215-91 respectively.

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1 Uniaxial Compression (Static)   Tests
	The results of compressive testing show that PVC and polypropylene fibers did not significantly 
influence the compressive strength of the PC.  Steel fibers gave the highest compressive strength.   For 
fiberglass the compressive strength was 15%  higher than that of PC.  The compressive modulus of 
elasticity decreased due to the addition of PVC, polypropylene and glass fibers

3.2 Pulse Velocity 
	The dynamic elastic modulus Ep was calculated using    and assuming 
Poisson's ratio as 0.2.    It can be seen that among the four types of fibers steel fibers gave the highest 
velocity and highest Ep.   PVC and polypropylene fibers gave the lowest velocities and Ep.  Comparison of 
results from the large cylinders shows that the values of Ed for PVC fibers and polypropylene fibers were 
about 10 %  and 19 % lower than those of PC.  The data obtained from small cylinders and from large 
cylinders show the same tendency.  The dynamic moduli of elasticity from small specimens were little 
larger than from large cylinders perhaps because the densities of small ones are little larger than large 
cylinders.

3.3 Impact Resonance Test
	Dynamic modulus of elasticity Ed was calculated from both longitudinal and transverse resonant 
frequencies, and dynamic shear modulus Gd was calculated from tortional resonant frequency.  From 
impact resonance test, it was observed that steel fibers gave the highest dynamic modulus and the PVC and 
polypropylene fibers gave the lowest dynamic modulus.   The dynamic modulus obtained from longitudinal 
and transverse vibration were no more than 10% than the corresponding static modulus from compression 
test.

3.4 The Relationships of Pulse Velocity Test and Impact Resonance Test
	The impact resonance tests were compared with  the pulse velocity tests.  when the frequency 
parameter (b) was equal to 0.8, the velocities from IR were very close to the pulse velocities.  It should be 
noted that pulse velocity decreased when polymer fiber and glass fiber except for steel fiber, but the 
damping ratio increased from 0.7% to 1.1%.

4. Conclusions
     	1)  PVC and polypropylene fibers did not significantly influence the compressive strength.   Fiber 
addition decreased the compressive elasticity modulus with all fibers expect for steel fibers.
	2) Among the four types of fibers investigated steel fibers gave the highest pulse velocity and 
highest pulse modulus of reinforced PC from pulse velocity test. PVC and polypropylene fibers gave the 
lowest pulse velocities and modulus.
	3) The dynamic modulus from  pulse velocity and Impact resonance test  agreed well with the 
static modulus. The dynamic data also show that fiber addition decreased the elastic modulus with all fibers 
expect for steel fibers. Also the velocities from IR were very close to the pulse velocities.
 
5. Acknowledgment
	This work is being supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF).

6. References
1. Vipulanandan, C. and Paul, E., “Performance of Epoxy and Polyester Polymer and Polymer Concrete”, 
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, V5, No. 1, PP 62-82 (1993).
2. S. Mantrala and C.  Vipulanandan, “Nondestructive Evaluation of Polyester Polymer Concrete”, ACI 
Materials Journal, Vol. 92, No. 6, 1995.
3. S.A. Mebarkia, Mechanical and Fracture Properties of High Strength Polymer Concrete under Various 
Loading and Corrosive Environments, Ph.D. dissertation, 1993


University of Houston, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering4800 Calhoun, Houston, TX 77024
Phone 713-743-4278 Fax 743-4260